Of Banks and Barrios: Engaging Local Partners to Reduce and Prevent Violence

Decades of work to disrupt cycles of violence in developing countries has resulted in some promising, replicable approaches. Yet, to get to a “best-fit” approach within a particular country, we know that we cannot simply cut and paste strategies and tools from one context to the next. Considering this, what can market research conducted by a bank in Tijuana tell us about local systems of violence prevention?

Using the USAID Local Systems Framework, one project found the answer. The Juntos para la Prevención de la Violencia (JPV – Together for the Prevention of Violence) project is working towards breaking the cycle of violence and crime in vulnerable communities in Mexico. Their work is focused in 10 municipalities that form a city network across five Mexican states: Tijuana, Baja California; Chihuahua and Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua; Escobedo, Guadalupe y Monterrey in Nuevo León; Zapopan, Tonalá, and Guadalajara in Jalisco; and Morelia, Michoacán. High levels of violence and corruption, as well as the presence of narco-trafficking cartels, make it particularly challenging to devise and implement feasible and sustainable crime and violence prevention strategies in Mexico. To combat this, JPV has developed a local prevention system. This local system focuses on crime and violence prevention by fostering collaboration among different actors and establishing incentives that encourage active participation of the actors and potential actors over time.

A local prevention system includes a set of interconnected actors within a specific locality — from the public sector, academic institutions, civil society, and private sector — who work together to reduce incidences of violence and crime. The actors identify the causes of violence, implement specific solutions for appropriate and effective targeting of those causes, and ensure knowledge management. The system is composed of three main axes, which are interdependent: Once JPV identifies the local system, the project supports the actors in identifying a strategic issue or challenge and its causes, implementing a solution accordingly, and then evaluating the solution’s effectiveness and results.

In one such local prevention system in Tijuana, Mexico, the local bank facilitated the formation of homeowner associations to deal with insolvent mortgages. Following the 2008 housing crisis, homes lost their value and many people were forced to abandon their homes, contributing to increased crime and instability. The bank wanted to rebuild and invest in the area, but community members were reluctant to purchase there due to security challenges. JPV linked the bank with service providers to promote crime prevention through environmental design and facilitated training on tools for identifying vulnerability to risk and measuring crime reduction. The project forged a strategic alliance between these groups to better incorporate social indicators in their efforts and ultimately improve the value of the land. This collaboration had the byproduct effect of reducing crime in the community by increasing residents’ sense of ownership and community engagement, thereby strengthening community fabric. The bank reduced insolvency rates from 80 percent to 20 percent, which also contributed to a reduction in crime as homes were occupied, property values increased, and the community became more engaged. The bank is now piloting seven more projects and collaborating with JPV to measure the crime rates and effects of these interventions as a means of focused deterrence, especially to understand if over time the crime is reduced or simply displaced to neighboring communities. This innovative approach to crime prevention exhibits the importance of analyzing local systems in a holistic manner, and how to identify and integrate “non-traditional actors” that already have legitimacy and respect within a community.

Source: Adapted from: Community Crime Prevention Framework, Department of Justice, Victoria, Australia

The process of identifying and analyzing a local protection system consists of three steps:

1. Assess who the local actors are and detect which local actors can comply with the functions of a system, such as resource coordination and management, solutions, training, and impacting public policy.

2. Identify the system based on the actors detected.

3. Perform the 5Rs analysis to evaluate system functionality (i.e., results, roles, relationships, rules and resources).

Once mapped and understood, the local prevention system requires that an ”anchor actor” be identified. The designated anchor actor facilitates collaboration, communication, transparency, accountability, sustainability, focus on outcomes, and evidence-based analysis among the various actors in the system. This strategic entity provides cohesion and capitalizes on the isolated crime and violence prevention efforts carried out within the territory.

Through the local systems of prevention approach to crime prevention, Mexico JPV is adapting the USAID Local Systems Framework in an innovative manner to lay the foundation for citizen security in Mexico for years to come. Chemonics expects that JPV, in collaboration with non-traditional local actors, will continue to develop tested, evidence-based local practices and a successful crime prevention model that can be replicated in many other parts of Mexico to help break the cycle of violence.

Anshu Singh is an intern in Chemonics’ Democracy and Governance Practice.

Leave a Comment

Politics Matter: How Implementers Can Do Development Differently

It makes intuitive sense at many levels: power and politics matter. We know this to be true in our own hometowns, organizations, or governments: different formal and informal alliances, power imbalances, and motivators — stemming from kinship or affinity, party politics, economic interests, cultural ties, race and gender relations, and other informal systems — determine a great deal of why people act as they do around otherwise stolid matters related to achieving an institution’s...

Read More »

6 Tips to Catapult Public Sector Reforms to the Next Level

Chemonics is implementing public sector reform projects across all regions and in most sectors. Whether it is improving the effectiveness of institutions of accountability in Tanzania or working with the Ministry of Education in Zambia to improve learner performance, we use a participatory approach to engage counterparts charged with providing services of all shapes and sizes to citizens. We apply a systems approach to ensure we are fostering partnerships and delivering targeted assistance to...

Read More »

Approaches that Projects Can Learn from the Democracy and Governance Sector

What is cross-sectoral democracy, rights, and governance (DRG) programming and why is it important? Cross-sectoral DRG programming recognizes that development issues are not single-sector problems — they overlap with other sectors; exist in a political context; and are as much, and often more, about power and relationships as they are about technical solutions. Solving a public health problem, for example, may involve governance, service delivery, citizen participation in decisions about health...

Read More »

Government Accountability is More than a Simple Equation

Improving government accountability has been a goal of democracy programming in the development world for years. Practitioners of governance reform have tended to pursue increased accountability by focusing on two individual factors of the equation: transparency, by opening up government decision-making processes and increasing access to information; and participation, by increasing citizens’ voices through strengthened civil society organizations and improved advocacy methods. The problem with...

Read More »

5 Ps to Move Open Government Forward

Open government is critical to enhancing essential services, opening civic space, and making government more accountable to citizens. Sustainable Development Goal 16 asks the international community to aim toward building more effective, responsive, and inclusive institutions, which evidence shows lead to better development outcomes for citizens. Recently, at the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Global Summit in Paris, governments around the world, in consultation with civil society, committed...

Read More »

Four Lessons for Sri Lanka from Bangladesh’s Right to Information Experience

Access to information is a fundamental right. More than 100 countries worldwide have adopted right to information (RTI) legislation, which are laws regulating public access to information, particularly from public institutions (sometimes referred to as access to information or freedom of information laws). These countries are increasingly recognizing the connection between good governance, accountability, and freedom of information. Most recently, Sri Lanka joined the ranks of these countries, ad...

Read More »

3 Questions with Kelly Brooks: On the Historic Colombian Peace Process

Kelly Brooks is chief of party for the USAID Human Rights Activity (HRA) in Colombia. HRA supports the Colombian government and civil society to foster respect for human rights and protect vulnerable populations. The Colombian government is negotiating a peace accord with the FARC guerrilla group after 50 years of conflict. What are the biggest challenges that the demobilization of the FARC presents, and how can the donor community support Colombia in overcoming those challenges? The FARC has...

Read More »

3 Questions with Rosa Jimenez: Prosecuting Criminals in the Dominican Republic

Rosa Jimenez is deputy chief of party for the USAID Dominican Republic Criminal Justice System Strengthened Project (CJSSP). The project is designed to improve the island nation’s judicial institutions, expedite prosecutions, and improve vulnerable groups’ access to legal protection. The Dominican Republic has one of the highest crime rates in the Caribbean. In your view, what is the most pressing challenge facing the country's criminal justice system? The essence of the problem is our low...

Read More »

Trust Between Government, Civil Society Bringing More Transparency and Accountability in Tanzania

By Betel Ezaz, Luciana Debenedetti, and Vieshnavi Rattehalli How can the global development community improve governmental transparency and accountability? This week, civil society actors and partners are gathering in Bogota to consider this question, and specifically, the role of civil society in promoting positive change while spurring accountable practices and institutions. Chemonics’ projects often engage local actors in strengthening accountability. Through these efforts, we have found that...

Read More »

4 Recommendations for “Thinking and Working Politically” on Local Governance Projects

As Sharon van Pelt argued in her recent blog post, politics are an inescapable reality for any international development project and must be factored into project design and implementation. The “thinking and working politically” concept is catching on, and more development practitioners are using political economy analysis to understand national-level politics in the countries where they work. Projects can benefit from these studies, but we also need to dig deeper to understand politics at the...

Read More »

Think Your Project Isn't Political? Think Again.

All changes and reforms are driven by interests and incentives. We generally understand this and, therefore, we try through our projects to foster positive incentives and collective interests that lead to the change we want to see. Sounds fairly straightforward, but clearly we know it is not, regardless of if we work in agriculture, climate change, health, education, or democracy and governance. Politics – that conflict and struggle for power – permeates the development activities we undertake in...

Read More »

Cambodia’s Shrinking Space for Civil Society and the Role of Donors

When conducting a preliminary analysis of civil society capacity in Cambodia in September 2015, there was one topic that dominated all my meetings and interviews: the new Law on Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations (also called LANGO). Everyone, from donors to international NGOs and local civil society organizations (CSOs), were sharing their concern about how LANGO would curtail the ability of civil society to do its work. The Cambodian Center for Human Rights described it as...

Read More »

The Policy Communities Approach to Integrating Democracy and Governance

There is a growing recognition that democracy, human rights, and governance (DRG) needs to be integrated into programs in other sectors of development. The policy community model takes a complementary approach, integrating sector policy reform objectives into DRG-focused projects. This model, which my team and I developed under USAID’s Program Representasi (ProRep) project in Indonesia, helped us to overcome sectorial siloes and could be replicated elsewhere. What are policy communities? Policy...

Read More »

Making Political Will Less of a Mystery

As the old saying goes, “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.” But in anti-corruption programming, it can be difficult to tell whether there is political will for change in the first place. How can you tell? What should you do if you discover, as is often the case, that there is not much will to address corruption in a developing country? How to gauge political will Historically, political will centered on the supply side and focused on the commitment of government to address corruption and enact...

Read More »

Know Your SDGs: Your Guide to What the U.N. Is Doing This Weekend

Today, the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit opens in New York. More than 150 world leaders are expected to gather there to adopt the proposed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), an ambitious document meant to define the world’s development agenda for the next 15 years. With 17 goals and 169 individual targets, the SDGs are more numerous and complex than their predecessor, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), adopted in 2000. But they are hugely important, both individually and...

Read More »

In Focus: Painting for Peace

In an area of Colombia terrorized by illegal armed groups, this mural stands out as a colorful beacon of tolerance and peace. Young people in Tumaco painted the community mural as part of a municipal human rights training initiative developed as part of Chemonics’ Colombia Human Rights Program. The program develops community leadership skills and promotes peace in the municipality. The Colombia Human Rights Program works in eight Colombian departments to spread awareness among targeted...

Read More »

In Focus: Greater Social and Economic Inclusion for All Citizens in Vietnam

The Vietnam Governance for Inclusive Growth project strengthens private sector competitiveness, enhances rule of law, and promotes greater social and economic inclusion for all citizens. As part of this initiative, the project is collaborating with government and civil society to strengthen public consultation around Vietnam’s Civil Code. This photo features ICS, a civil society organization representing the LGBT community, which has engaged with the Ministry of Justice to provide inputs to the...

Read More »

Similar Context and Language Matter: Shared Experience from a Common History

Last year I witnessed firsthand how common history and language can foster and promote positive changes across borders. In June 2014, I was invited by the USAID/Moldova Rule of Law Institutional Strengthening Program to give a presentation on our USAID/Ukraine FAIR Justice Project judicial reform efforts, including innovative work we are doing related to court user satisfaction surveys, at a conference they were organizing on modern court administration techniques later that year. I readily...

Read More »

Democracy and Governance: Measuring for Success

I once commented to a caseflow management trainer that caseflow management is “as much art as science.” He replied that it is actually “much more art” than science. My work on rule of law projects has led me to the same conclusion. Democracy and governance (D&G) programs are dynamic. Each program begins with a clear plan and well-defined objectives, then many competing interests and priorities emerge during implementation. D&G programs aim for positive changes in organizational...

Read More »