3 Questions with Michele Piercey: Conflict and Exclusion as the Front Door for Extremist Recruitment


Michele Piercey is the director of Chemonics’ Peace, Stability, and Transition Practice. She is an international development practitioner with 17 years of experience, including 10 years working on political transition and countering violent extremism (CVE) programs in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Tunisia.

In February, a famine was declared in South Sudan. And in 2016, the media frequently linked the conflict in Syria to the country’s extreme drought. What do we know about the complex relationship between climate change and conflict, particularly resource-based conflicts?

Climate change affects communities in a way that makes them chaotic and difficult to govern. I've often said that joining a violent extremist group is an adaptation to climate change. It’s not a particularly positive adaptation, but it’s something that young people in some regions of the world — for example around the Lake Chad Basin — have been forced into because their traditional way of life has gone away. The reasons are complex. That loss of traditional lifestyles is not only attributable to climate change, but also to land grabs, corruption, breakdown of institutions, conflict and insecurity, or simply the impacts of modernization transforming traditional livelihoods. In any case, many populations have had to adapt their traditional practices, or those practices have gone away entirely.

There are young people who expected life to look like what it did for the generations before them. And due to climate change and all the other compounding factors I just mentioned, that future might not be available to them. Extremist groups take advantage of that vulnerability and offer them a path toward something. They offer a way of making a living, but also a sense of inclusion.

Water scarcity in particular is driving conflict in a lot of places, including the Middle East, the Lake Chad Basin, and Afghanistan. In the fighting that arises, there aren’t just two sides to the conflict. Extremist groups can use the fighting as a pretext for extremist attacks. Or they try to mediate the disputes and establish themselves as providers of governance. It also creates mass movements of people that can cause huge security problems and social upheaval that worsens the situation for already vulnerable youth. The cycle is insidious.

So yes, there’s often a link between climate change, access to land and resources, and conflict. And conflict is often the front door for extremist recruiting and radicalization.

What approaches or interventions have been proven to be successful in conflict mitigation, stability, and countering violent extremism (CVE)?

The most effective programming paths try to help young people to find licit, peaceful alternatives to extremism, and other paths to belonging — whether that’s finding ways to resolve land issues or brokering connections between young people and their government; between young people and each other. Livelihoods support, by itself, is not usually an effective antidote to violent extremism, even if the loss of livelihoods is a driver. To begin with, good livelihoods outcomes are difficult to achieve in conflict affected, poorly governed, or badly climate-degraded areas. Vocational training programs have been criticized for creating expectations that can’t be met in the actual job market.

Chemonics’ Peace, Stability, and Transition Practice is leading research on a handful of the tools, methods, and approaches that can support CVE programming. One example we have is from our Mauritania CVE project. Under that program, we used the government institutional capacity assessment (GICA), adapted it for the CVE context, and administered it to the Ministry of Islamic Affairs to assess their capacity on CVE competencies. We are following that up with tailored, collaborative capacity building delivered in a cascaded training model. We also developed a risk assessment tool for national governments to determine how they prioritize their programming that is being piloted on the Mauritania project.

In addition, we’re exploring new innovations in CVE work that might strengthen our implementation and influence thinking on CVE more broadly. For example, we are investigating the applicability of different suicide prevention indicators to determine whether they work in CVE programming. We are also carrying out some field research on the applicability of crime and violence prevention models to CVE programming.

One approach that looks promising and we think warrants more research is in the area of VE narratives and counter-narratives. In democracy, governance, and CVE programming, it’s often not so much about the specific program interventions, but what those interventions communicate to beneficiaries and communities. Because extremists are making an emotional appeal to recruits and supporters, their narrative is nested in emotional appeals about persecution, justice, and honor. For example, one extremist narrative is, “The West hates and oppresses Muslims, and it’s your duty as a Muslim to violently resist.” What is our counter-narrative? Just disagreeing with emotional — and at least partly factual — appeals isn’t going to resonate with our audience.

We, as CVE practitioners, want to devise counter-narratives that are true, believable, and credible, but also resonant and inspirational. We can’t just insist, “No, the world doesn’t hate Islam,” because bias against Muslims, however unacceptable we find it, is a real thing in some places. We need to develop a counter-narrative that actively discourages people from joining an extremist group and appeals to their sense of pride, justice and tolerance. And importantly, our counter-narratives need to be backed up with action. Effective CVE is about more than messaging campaigns.

CVE programming intersects with social inclusion, gender, youth, and a number of other areas. What cross-cutting areas and themes will be critical in future programs and why?

CVE is highly intersectional. To turn the question around, I think we will be seeing CVE as an element or cross-cutting theme of a greater and greater number of programs where you might not expect it. All kinds of programming across different sectors are being designed to have a CVE effect. For example, we have recently seen economic growth solicitations that also ask us to address the appeal of extremism by strengthening economic connections and fostering opportunities.

A lot of programming has this cross-cutting theme of social cohesion, fostering belonging, or youth empowerment. I often read that as code for countering violent extremism, or at least undermining the potential influence of radical groups, and I do think it’s wise. CVE programming by itself can “silo” beneficiaries so they start to feel even more marginalized by virtue of being targeted as vulnerable to extremism. Drivers of extremism are cross-cutting — lack of effective government, weak economies, corruption, injustice and impunity. If you’re addressing impunity, you’re explicitly or implicitly undermining one of the grievances that drive extremist recruitment. Discrete, explicit CVE programming definitely has a place, but it has to complement a bigger strategy of making governments and economies more inclusive.

Learn more about Chemonics’ work in peace, stability, and transition.

Leave a Comment

Target Interventions to Reduce Homicides in Mexico


Homicides in Mexico had been steadily falling since hitting their peak between 2010 and 2011, but sudden spikes in 2015 and 2016 are causing the international community to look around for answers. October 2016 was the most violent month in nearly four years, appearing to wipe out recent progress. The good news is that based on disaggregated data, we know enough to start addressing the unavoidable challenge of reducing homicidal violence in Mexico. The key here is to walk away from generalizations...

Read More »

Inclusion: A Critical Element in Effective Approaches to Combatting Violent Extremism


Earlier this year in Mombasa, a youth activist told me he knew plenty of young men who joined Al Shabaab. Many had participated in livelihoods and vocational training activities funded by NGOs. Some even found jobs. Nonetheless, they decided to join the notorious violent extremist organization. This was not the first time that I had heard this, and the situation is not unique to Kenya. "The mzungu," he told me, using the local term for a foreign white person, “thinks that it’s only about having...

Read More »

Predicting Human Rights Violations Before They Happen


In 2000, Colombia was besieged by what had been one of the most violent decades in the history of its armed internal conflict. The rise and consolidation of paramilitary groups throughout the country that had begun as a self-protection movement against the guerrillas were out of control, and Colombia saw some of the worst human rights violations with millions of internally displaced persons and almost 2,000 massacres between 1980 and 2012 that left 11,700 people dead. In response to public outcry...

Read More »

3 Questions with Lainie Reisman: Preventing Crime and Violence in Mexico's Roughest Places


Lainie Reisman is a youth violence expert with 15 years of experience in development. She is currently Chemonics' chief of party for the USAID Prevención de la Violencia (JPV) project in Mexico. JPV is designed to strengthen the Mexican government’s ability, from the federal to municipal levels, to prevent crime and violence. JPV also works closely with civil society, the private sector, and academia. Your program is working in Juarez, Monterrey, and Tijuana, and other areas selected in part...

Read More »

The Power of Artistic Creativity in Preventing Electoral Violence in Côte d’Ivoire


This post was originally published by the Alliance for Peacebuilding and is cross-posted with permission. Chemonics is honored to be an Alliance for Peacebuilding member organization. The escalation of violence in Côte d’Ivoire after the disputed 2010 presidential election led to the worst humanitarian crisis in the country’s history. Violence devastated families, with an estimated 3,000 deaths, numerous arrests, and hundreds of thousands forced to flee as internally displaced persons or...

Read More »

“A Job Is the First Part of the Promise”: Unpacking Youth Grievances Five Years After the Tunisian Revolution


A little more than five years ago, Sidi Bouzid fruit vendor Mohamed Bouazizi set himself alight. When he was unable to pay a bribe to be allowed to sell fruit from a wheelbarrow, a local policewoman reportedly slapped him, spat at him, confiscated his scales, and threw his cart aside, ruining the merchandise he had purchased on credit to sell. An hour later, before dousing himself in gasoline front of the governor’s office, he cried “How do you expect me to live?” The massive, youth-led public...

Read More »

Can Teaching Human Rights in Conflict Zones Build Peace?


When the governor’s office of Antioquia first approached USAID’s Colombia Human Rights Program (HRP III) with the idea of creating the first ever official human rights school, I couldn’t help but think, “Oh no, not another school.” Unfortunately, it is often the case that students, particularly in the area of human rights, are exposed to a plethora of theory with little knowledge gained that translates into action or meaningful change in the real world. Fortunately, Jairo Emiro Rodgriguez proved...

Read More »

Promoting Peace at the Municipal Level


This post was originally published by the Alliance for Peacebuilding and is cross-posted with permission. Chemonics is honored to be an Alliance for Peacebuilding member organization. In Kosovo, one of the biggest sources of instability is inter-ethnic hostility between majority and minority populations. Although years of tensions cannot be erased overnight, helping local communities have meaningful discussions can pave a pathway to stability and peace in Kosovo — and the greater Balkans....

Read More »

Where's the Impact? Measuring Results on Countering Violent Extremism Programs


On September 29, more than 100 countries and representatives of civil society attended the Leaders' Summit on Countering ISIL and Violent Extremism at the UN General Assembly to further the global discussion about the importance of combating violent extremism (CVE) around the world. The meeting was preceded by the White House Summit to Counter Violent Extremism in February, which endorsed an action agenda for the community of actors in military, civil society, and government. While global...

Read More »

Know Your SDGs: Your Guide to What the U.N. Is Doing This Weekend


Today, the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit opens in New York. More than 150 world leaders are expected to gather there to adopt the proposed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), an ambitious document meant to define the world’s development agenda for the next 15 years. With 17 goals and 169 individual targets, the SDGs are more numerous and complex than their predecessor, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), adopted in 2000. But they are hugely important, both individually and...

Read More »

Know Your SDGs: To Create Sustainable Peace, A Focus On Governance Is Necessary But Not Enough


by Elizabeth Martin and Wynne Mancini Daily headlines highlight the urgent need for the international community to find a coherent shared approach to managing and mitigating conflict. In Syria alone — just one of the countries most affected by war in recent years — 74,000 people died in 2014 and nearly 250,000 have died in the last three years due to the country’s ongoing conflict. At the start of 2014, persons internally displaced because of armed conflict, generalized violence, and human rights...

Read More »

Putting Conflict in Context


In the past few weeks, we’ve all seen the headlines as growing numbers of refugees flee the ongoing conflict in Syria. According to the armed conflicts database maintained by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, there are currently 42 active conflicts in the world, more than 12 million refugees, and approximately 180,000 people have been killed in conflict so far this year. Development professionals work in both areas of immediate crisis, and countries that need help rebuilding after...

Read More »

When a Crisis Hits: The Case of Ukraine AgroInvest in Crimea


What do you do when another country takes control of the territory in which your project is  heavily invested—not just financially, but also in terms of staff, resources, equipment, and time? It’s a unique crisis that a development practitioner might not think of, much less prepare for. But that’s exactly what happened in March of 2014 to the USAID Ukraine AgroInvest project, implemented by Chemonics, when Russia illegally occupied, and ultimately annexed, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea from...

Read More »

Never Forget: Using Remembrance to Prevent Future Violence in Côte d’Ivoire


This post was originally published by the Alliance for Peacebuilding, and is cross-posted with permission. “It’s hard… I lost many things because of this violence. We lost so much in this crisis. I apologize to the Wè and Malinke youth, and strangers, too, so we can avoid another crisis in Duékoué. Let’s make peace, let’s make peace, let’s make peace…” Fayé Nadège of the Dahoua neighborhood in Duékoué, Côte d’Ivoire says as she recalls the tragedies of the post-electoral violence in 2010-2011....

Read More »